Hi tglx,
At 03/01/2017 07:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
Please make your subject line short and a precise summary phrase, not an
overlong sentence.
After we revert the the mapping of "cpuid <-> nodeid" fixed at the
booting time. and do it at the
Hi tglx,
At 03/01/2017 07:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
Please make your subject line short and a precise summary phrase, not an
overlong sentence.
After we revert the the mapping of "cpuid <-> nodeid" fixed at the
booting time. and do it at the
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
Please make your subject line short and a precise summary phrase, not an
overlong sentence.
> After we revert the the mapping of "cpuid <-> nodeid" fixed at the
> booting time. and do it at the hot-plug time. we should also do the
> verification of
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
Please make your subject line short and a precise summary phrase, not an
overlong sentence.
> After we revert the the mapping of "cpuid <-> nodeid" fixed at the
> booting time. and do it at the hot-plug time. we should also do the
> verification of
After we revert the the mapping of "cpuid <-> nodeid" fixed at the
booting time. and do it at the hot-plug time. we should also do the
verification of duplicate proc_id at the time.
The patch rename the verfication function and move it to
drivers/acpi::acpi_processor_get_info.
Signed-off-by: Dou
After we revert the the mapping of "cpuid <-> nodeid" fixed at the
booting time. and do it at the hot-plug time. we should also do the
verification of duplicate proc_id at the time.
The patch rename the verfication function and move it to
drivers/acpi::acpi_processor_get_info.
Signed-off-by: Dou
6 matches
Mail list logo
