(11/22/2013 3:33 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/22, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>
>> (11/22/2013 12:54 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> We can kill either task->did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC, they are
>>> mutually exclusive. The patch kill ->did_exec because it has
>>> a single user.
>>
>> It's ok.
>>
>>
On 11/22, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> (11/22/2013 12:54 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > We can kill either task->did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC, they are
> > mutually exclusive. The patch kill ->did_exec because it has
> > a single user.
>
> It's ok.
>
> but,
>
> > - * Auch. Had to add the 'did_exec' flag
On 11/22, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
(11/22/2013 12:54 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
We can kill either task-did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC, they are
mutually exclusive. The patch kill -did_exec because it has
a single user.
It's ok.
but,
- * Auch. Had to add the 'did_exec' flag to conform
(11/22/2013 3:33 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 11/22, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
(11/22/2013 12:54 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
We can kill either task-did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC, they are
mutually exclusive. The patch kill -did_exec because it has
a single user.
It's ok.
but,
- * Auch. Had to
4 matches
Mail list logo