Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] kill task_struct->did_exec

2013-11-22 Thread KOSAKI Motohiro
(11/22/2013 3:33 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 11/22, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> >> (11/22/2013 12:54 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote: >>> We can kill either task->did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC, they are >>> mutually exclusive. The patch kill ->did_exec because it has >>> a single user. >> >> It's ok. >> >>

[PATCH v2 4/4] kill task_struct->did_exec

2013-11-22 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 11/22, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > (11/22/2013 12:54 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > We can kill either task->did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC, they are > > mutually exclusive. The patch kill ->did_exec because it has > > a single user. > > It's ok. > > but, > > > - * Auch. Had to add the 'did_exec' flag

[PATCH v2 4/4] kill task_struct-did_exec

2013-11-22 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 11/22, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: (11/22/2013 12:54 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote: We can kill either task-did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC, they are mutually exclusive. The patch kill -did_exec because it has a single user. It's ok. but, - * Auch. Had to add the 'did_exec' flag to conform

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] kill task_struct-did_exec

2013-11-22 Thread KOSAKI Motohiro
(11/22/2013 3:33 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote: On 11/22, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: (11/22/2013 12:54 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote: We can kill either task-did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC, they are mutually exclusive. The patch kill -did_exec because it has a single user. It's ok. but, - * Auch. Had to