On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:49:44PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Corentin Labbe
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:33:47 +0200
>
> > - mac->link.port = GMAC_CONTROL_PS;
> > mac->link.duplex = GMAC_CONTROL_DM;
> > - mac->link.speed = GMAC_CONTROL_FES;
> > +
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:49:44PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Corentin Labbe
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:33:47 +0200
>
> > - mac->link.port = GMAC_CONTROL_PS;
> > mac->link.duplex = GMAC_CONTROL_DM;
> > - mac->link.speed = GMAC_CONTROL_FES;
> > + mac->link.speed10 =
From: Corentin Labbe
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:33:47 +0200
> The current stmmac_adjust_link() part which handle speed have
> some if (has_platform) code and my dwmac-sun8i will add more of them.
>
> So we need to handle better speed selection.
> Moreover the struct
From: Corentin Labbe
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:33:47 +0200
> The current stmmac_adjust_link() part which handle speed have
> some if (has_platform) code and my dwmac-sun8i will add more of them.
>
> So we need to handle better speed selection.
> Moreover the struct link member speed and port
The current stmmac_adjust_link() part which handle speed have
some if (has_platform) code and my dwmac-sun8i will add more of them.
So we need to handle better speed selection.
Moreover the struct link member speed and port are hard to guess their
purpose. And their unique usage are to be
The current stmmac_adjust_link() part which handle speed have
some if (has_platform) code and my dwmac-sun8i will add more of them.
So we need to handle better speed selection.
Moreover the struct link member speed and port are hard to guess their
purpose. And their unique usage are to be
6 matches
Mail list logo