On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:47:32PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> stimers_pending optimization only helps us to avoid multiple
> kvm_make_request() calls. This doesn't happen very often and these
> calls are very cheap in the first place, remove open-coded version of
> stimer_mark_pending() from
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:47:32PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> stimers_pending optimization only helps us to avoid multiple
> kvm_make_request() calls. This doesn't happen very often and these
> calls are very cheap in the first place, remove open-coded version of
> stimer_mark_pending() from
On 26/11/18 16:47, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> stimers_pending optimization only helps us to avoid multiple
> kvm_make_request() calls. This doesn't happen very often and these
> calls are very cheap in the first place, remove open-coded version of
> stimer_mark_pending() from
On 26/11/18 16:47, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> stimers_pending optimization only helps us to avoid multiple
> kvm_make_request() calls. This doesn't happen very often and these
> calls are very cheap in the first place, remove open-coded version of
> stimer_mark_pending() from
stimers_pending optimization only helps us to avoid multiple
kvm_make_request() calls. This doesn't happen very often and these
calls are very cheap in the first place, remove open-coded version of
stimer_mark_pending() from kvm_hv_notify_acked_sint().
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini
Signed-off-by:
stimers_pending optimization only helps us to avoid multiple
kvm_make_request() calls. This doesn't happen very often and these
calls are very cheap in the first place, remove open-coded version of
stimer_mark_pending() from kvm_hv_notify_acked_sint().
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini
Signed-off-by:
6 matches
Mail list logo