Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] amba: Make the remove callback return void

2020-12-17 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:41 PM Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Technically there are still some maintainers' ack missing but I'd really > like to get this series applied. As I don't want to make people angry > I'm asking once more for your Acks. Acked-by: Linus Walleij Sorry for taking so long,

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] amba: Make the remove callback return void

2020-12-14 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 02:01:41PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > [This is a resend because somehow my MUA failed to parse the To: list > and dropped it without me noticing it. Sorry to those who got it twice > now.] > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:31:38PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] amba: Make the remove callback return void

2020-12-03 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 02:01:41PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > [This is a resend because somehow my MUA failed to parse the To: list > and dropped it without me noticing it. Sorry to those who got it twice > now.] > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:31:38PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] amba: Make the remove callback return void

2020-12-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 02:01:41PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > I failed to Cc: the relevant maintainers before, so that's why I'm > adressing you now. The idea is to let this series (completely available at >

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] amba: Make the remove callback return void

2020-12-03 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 02:01:41PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > [This is a resend because somehow my MUA failed to parse the To: list > and dropped it without me noticing it. Sorry to those who got it twice > now.] > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:31:38PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] amba: Make the remove callback return void

2020-12-03 Thread Alexandre Belloni
On 24/11/2020 14:31:38+0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > From: Uwe Kleine-König > > All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the > driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to > return a value here. > > Change the remove prototype to return void,

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] amba: Make the remove callback return void

2020-12-03 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello, [This is a resend because somehow my MUA failed to parse the To: list and dropped it without me noticing it. Sorry to those who got it twice now.] On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:31:38PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > From: Uwe Kleine-König > > All amba drivers return 0 in their remove

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] amba: Make the remove callback return void

2020-12-03 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello, On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:31:38PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the > driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to > return a value here. > > Change the remove prototype to return void, which

[PATCH v2 4/5] amba: Make the remove callback return void

2020-11-24 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
From: Uwe Kleine-König All amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to return a value here. Change the remove prototype to return void, which makes it explicit that returning an error value doesn't work