On 11/30/2017 12:50 AM, Paul Lawrence wrote:
> For now we can hard-code ASAN ABI level 5, since historical clang builds
> can't build the kernel anyway. We also need to emulate gcc's
> __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ flag, or memset() calls won't be instrumented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann
On 11/30/2017 12:50 AM, Paul Lawrence wrote:
> For now we can hard-code ASAN ABI level 5, since historical clang builds
> can't build the kernel anyway. We also need to emulate gcc's
> __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ flag, or memset() calls won't be instrumented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann
>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:50 PM, 'Paul Lawrence' via kasan-dev
wrote:
> For now we can hard-code ASAN ABI level 5, since historical clang builds
> can't build the kernel anyway. We also need to emulate gcc's
> __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ flag, or memset() calls won't be
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:50 PM, 'Paul Lawrence' via kasan-dev
wrote:
> For now we can hard-code ASAN ABI level 5, since historical clang builds
> can't build the kernel anyway. We also need to emulate gcc's
> __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ flag, or memset() calls won't be instrumented.
>
>
For now we can hard-code ASAN ABI level 5, since historical clang builds
can't build the kernel anyway. We also need to emulate gcc's
__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ flag, or memset() calls won't be instrumented.
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann
Signed-off-by: Paul Lawrence
For now we can hard-code ASAN ABI level 5, since historical clang builds
can't build the kernel anyway. We also need to emulate gcc's
__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ flag, or memset() calls won't be instrumented.
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann
Signed-off-by: Paul Lawrence
---
6 matches
Mail list logo