On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 10:02:58 +0800
> Li Bin wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > index 311bcf3..db0f6b1 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > @@ -106,13 +106,11 @@
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 10:02:58 +0800
> Li Bin wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > index 311bcf3..db0f6b1 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> >
On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 10:02:58 +0800
Li Bin wrote:
> There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
> case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
> a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
> code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and
On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 10:02:58 +0800
Li Bin wrote:
> There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
> case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
> a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
> code grabs
There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions
from the ftrace list, such
There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing
case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when
a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this
code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions
from the ftrace list, such
6 matches
Mail list logo