Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] stacktrace: introduce snprint_stack_trace for buffer output

2014-11-23 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 03:37:59PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:14:04 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > Current stacktrace only have the function for console output. > > page_owner that will be introduced in following patch needs to print > > the output of stacktrace into the

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] stacktrace: introduce snprint_stack_trace for buffer output

2014-11-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:14:04 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > Current stacktrace only have the function for console output. > page_owner that will be introduced in following patch needs to print > the output of stacktrace into the buffer for our own output format > so so new function, snprint_stack_tra

[PATCH v2 5/7] stacktrace: introduce snprint_stack_trace for buffer output

2014-11-21 Thread Joonsoo Kim
Current stacktrace only have the function for console output. page_owner that will be introduced in following patch needs to print the output of stacktrace into the buffer for our own output format so so new function, snprint_stack_trace(), is needed. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim --- include/linux