Hi Murzin,
On 2015/2/16 18:05, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> Hi Yun,
>
> On 15/02/15 09:32, Yun Wu wrote:
>> There is one more condition that needs to be considered when judging
>> whether LPI feature is enabled or not, which is whether there is any
>> ITS available and correctly enabled.
>>
>> This
Hi Yun,
On 15/02/15 09:32, Yun Wu wrote:
> There is one more condition that needs to be considered when judging
> whether LPI feature is enabled or not, which is whether there is any
> ITS available and correctly enabled.
>
> This patch will fix this by caching ITS enabling status in the GIC
>
Hi Murzin,
On 2015/2/16 18:05, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
Hi Yun,
On 15/02/15 09:32, Yun Wu wrote:
There is one more condition that needs to be considered when judging
whether LPI feature is enabled or not, which is whether there is any
ITS available and correctly enabled.
This patch will
Hi Yun,
On 15/02/15 09:32, Yun Wu wrote:
There is one more condition that needs to be considered when judging
whether LPI feature is enabled or not, which is whether there is any
ITS available and correctly enabled.
This patch will fix this by caching ITS enabling status in the GIC
chip
There is one more condition that needs to be considered when judging
whether LPI feature is enabled or not, which is whether there is any
ITS available and correctly enabled.
This patch will fix this by caching ITS enabling status in the GIC
chip data structure.
Signed-off-by: Yun Wu
---
There is one more condition that needs to be considered when judging
whether LPI feature is enabled or not, which is whether there is any
ITS available and correctly enabled.
This patch will fix this by caching ITS enabling status in the GIC
chip data structure.
Signed-off-by: Yun Wu
6 matches
Mail list logo