Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > >> >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:34 AM,

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > >> >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:34 AM, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy >> >> wrote: >> >> >>

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:34 AM, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy > >> wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:34 AM, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Thanks for brining it up. I was planning to ask either

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:34 AM, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy >> wrote: >> >> > Thanks for brining it up. I was planning to ask

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:34 AM, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy >> wrote: >> >> > Thanks for brining it up. I was planning to ask either Andy or Lee >> > regarding >> > this issue after all patches

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Darren Hart wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:26:00PM -0700, > sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > > > > > > Currently in WCOVE PMIC mfd driver, all second level irq chips >

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Darren Hart wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:26:00PM -0700, > sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > > > > > > Currently in WCOVE PMIC mfd driver, all second level irq chips > > By currently I believe you mean after

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Sat, 22 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:34 AM, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy > wrote: > > > Thanks for brining it up. I was planning to ask either Andy or Lee regarding > > this issue after all patches in the series are

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Sat, 22 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:34 AM, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy > wrote: > > > Thanks for brining it up. I was planning to ask either Andy or Lee regarding > > this issue after all patches in the series are reviewed. > > Darren, I'm planning to review

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:34 AM, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy wrote: > Thanks for brining it up. I was planning to ask either Andy or Lee regarding > this issue after all patches in the series are reviewed. Darren, I'm planning to review this soon.

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:34 AM, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy wrote: > Thanks for brining it up. I was planning to ask either Andy or Lee regarding > this issue after all patches in the series are reviewed. Darren, I'm planning to review this soon. P.S. We have few series flying around regarding

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

Hi Darren, Thanks for the review. On 04/21/2017 03:00 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:26:00PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Currently in WCOVE PMIC mfd driver, all

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

Hi Darren, Thanks for the review. On 04/21/2017 03:00 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:26:00PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Currently in WCOVE PMIC mfd driver, all second level irq chips By currently I believe

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:26:00PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > > Currently in WCOVE PMIC mfd driver, all second level irq chips By currently I believe you mean after the earlier patch

Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:26:00PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > > Currently in WCOVE PMIC mfd driver, all second level irq chips By currently I believe you mean after the earlier patch in this series is applied, correct? This one

[PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Currently in WCOVE PMIC mfd driver, all second level irq chips are chained to the respective first level irqs. So there is no need for explicitly unmasking the first level irq in this driver. This patches removes this

[PATCH v2 8/8] platform: x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: remove first level irq unmask

From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Currently in WCOVE PMIC mfd driver, all second level irq chips are chained to the respective first level irqs. So there is no need for explicitly unmasking the first level irq in this driver. This patches removes this level 1 irq unmask support. Signed-off-by: