Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA

2016-01-01 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Roman Volkov writes: > В Thu, 31 Dec 2015 23:33:45 +0100 (CET) > Thomas Gleixner пишет: > >> Roman, >> >> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Roman Volkov wrote: >> > Since vt8500 and PXA timers are identical, use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from >> > PXA, which is bigger than existing value. It is required to >> >

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA

2016-01-01 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Roman Volkov wrote: > From: Roman Volkov > > Since vt8500 and PXA timers are identical, use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA, > which is bigger than existing value. It is required to determine the > minimum delay which hardware can generate. This changelog makes no sense at all.

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA

2016-01-01 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Roman Volkov writes: > В Thu, 31 Dec 2015 23:33:45 +0100 (CET) > Thomas Gleixner пишет: > >> Roman, >> >> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Roman Volkov wrote: >> > Since vt8500 and PXA timers are identical, use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from >> > PXA, which is bigger than existing

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA

2016-01-01 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Roman Volkov wrote: > From: Roman Volkov > > Since vt8500 and PXA timers are identical, use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA, > which is bigger than existing value. It is required to determine the > minimum delay which hardware can generate. This changelog makes

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA

2015-12-31 Thread Roman Volkov
В Thu, 31 Dec 2015 23:33:45 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner пишет: > Roman, > > On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Roman Volkov wrote: > > Since vt8500 and PXA timers are identical, use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from > > PXA, which is bigger than existing value. It is required to > > determine the minimum delay which

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA

2015-12-31 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Roman, On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Roman Volkov wrote: > Since vt8500 and PXA timers are identical, use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA, > which is bigger than existing value. It is required to determine the > minimum delay which hardware can generate. Now that brings up the obvious question: If the vt8500

[PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA

2015-12-31 Thread Roman Volkov
From: Roman Volkov Since vt8500 and PXA timers are identical, use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA, which is bigger than existing value. It is required to determine the minimum delay which hardware can generate. This commit fixes vt8500 breakage in Linux 4.2 introduced by c6eb3f7 ('hrtimer: Get rid of

[PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA

2015-12-31 Thread Roman Volkov
From: Roman Volkov Since vt8500 and PXA timers are identical, use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA, which is bigger than existing value. It is required to determine the minimum delay which hardware can generate. This commit fixes vt8500 breakage in Linux 4.2 introduced by c6eb3f7

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA

2015-12-31 Thread Roman Volkov
В Thu, 31 Dec 2015 23:33:45 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner пишет: > Roman, > > On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Roman Volkov wrote: > > Since vt8500 and PXA timers are identical, use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from > > PXA, which is bigger than existing value. It is required to > > determine the

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA

2015-12-31 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Roman, On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Roman Volkov wrote: > Since vt8500 and PXA timers are identical, use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA, > which is bigger than existing value. It is required to determine the > minimum delay which hardware can generate. Now that brings up the obvious question: If the vt8500