Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-06 Thread Tejun Heo
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:29:16AM +0800, Tang Chen wrote: > I'm sorry but seeing from lkml, it is OK. And the patch was formatted > by git and sent by git send-email. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/2/135 Yeah, I checked that too but I think lkml.org is doing the QP decoding. The raw link

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-06 Thread Tejun Heo
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:29:16AM +0800, Tang Chen wrote: I'm sorry but seeing from lkml, it is OK. And the patch was formatted by git and sent by git send-email. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/2/135 Yeah, I checked that too but I think lkml.org is doing the QP decoding. The raw link from

[PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-05 Thread Tang Chen
At early time, memblock will reserve some memory for the kernel, such as the kernel code and data segments, initrd file, and so on， which means the kernel resides in these memory regions. Even if these memory regions are hotpluggable, we should not mark them as hotpluggable. Otherwise the kernel

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-05 Thread Tang Chen
On 08/05/2013 10:52 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:22:47PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote: I have resent the v2 patch-set. Would you please give some more comments about the memblock and x86 booting code modification ? Patch 13 still seems corrupt. Is it a problem on my side maybe?

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-05 Thread Zhang Yanfei
Hi tj, On 08/05/2013 10:52 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:22:47PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote: >> I have resent the v2 patch-set. Would you please give some more >> comments about the memblock and x86 booting code modification ? > > Patch 13 still seems corrupt. Is it a problem on

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-05 Thread Tejun Heo
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:22:47PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote: > I have resent the v2 patch-set. Would you please give some more > comments about the memblock and x86 booting code modification ? Patch 13 still seems corrupt. Is it a problem on my side maybe? Nope, gmane raw message is corrupt too.

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-05 Thread Tang Chen
Hi tj, I have resent the v2 patch-set. Would you please give some more comments about the memblock and x86 booting code modification ? And I'm also discussing with the ACPICA guys about the implementation on ACPI side. I hope we can catch up with 3.12 this time. Thanks. On 08/02/2013 05:14

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-05 Thread Tang Chen
Hi tj, I have resent the v2 patch-set. Would you please give some more comments about the memblock and x86 booting code modification ? And I'm also discussing with the ACPICA guys about the implementation on ACPI side. I hope we can catch up with 3.12 this time. Thanks. On 08/02/2013 05:14

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-05 Thread Tejun Heo
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:22:47PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote: I have resent the v2 patch-set. Would you please give some more comments about the memblock and x86 booting code modification ? Patch 13 still seems corrupt. Is it a problem on my side maybe? Nope, gmane raw message is corrupt too.

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-05 Thread Zhang Yanfei
Hi tj, On 08/05/2013 10:52 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:22:47PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote: I have resent the v2 patch-set. Would you please give some more comments about the memblock and x86 booting code modification ? Patch 13 still seems corrupt. Is it a problem on my

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-05 Thread Tang Chen
On 08/05/2013 10:52 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:22:47PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote: I have resent the v2 patch-set. Would you please give some more comments about the memblock and x86 booting code modification ? Patch 13 still seems corrupt. Is it a problem on my side maybe?

[PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-05 Thread Tang Chen
At early time, memblock will reserve some memory for the kernel, such as the kernel code and data segments, initrd file, and so on， which means the kernel resides in these memory regions. Even if these memory regions are hotpluggable, we should not mark them as hotpluggable. Otherwise the kernel

[PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-02 Thread Tang Chen
At early time, memblock will reserve some memory for the kernel, such as the kernel code and data segments, initrd file, and so on， which means the kernel resides in these memory regions. Even if these memory regions are hotpluggable, we should not mark them as hotpluggable. Otherwise the kernel

[PATCH v2 RESEND 13/18] x86, numa, mem_hotplug: Skip all the regions the kernel resides in.

2013-08-02 Thread Tang Chen
At early time, memblock will reserve some memory for the kernel, such as the kernel code and data segments, initrd file, and so on， which means the kernel resides in these memory regions. Even if these memory regions are hotpluggable, we should not mark them as hotpluggable. Otherwise the kernel