> From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org On Behalf
> Of Niklas Schnelle
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 5:10 PM
> To: Bjorn Helgaas ; Alex Williamson
>
>
[...]
> >>
> >> FWIW, pci_physfn() never returns NULL, it returns the provided pdev if
> >> is_virtfn is not set. This proposal wouldn't change
On 8/27/20 10:33 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 01:17:48PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:31:38 -0500
>> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>>> Re the subject line, this patch does a lot more than just "introduce a
>>> flag"; AFAICT it actually enables important
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 01:17:48PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:31:38 -0500
> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > Re the subject line, this patch does a lot more than just "introduce a
> > flag"; AFAICT it actually enables important VFIO functionality, e.g.,
> > something like:
On 8/27/20 2:31 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Re the subject line, this patch does a lot more than just "introduce a
flag"; AFAICT it actually enables important VFIO functionality, e.g.,
something like:
vfio/pci: Enable MMIO access for s390 detached VFs
Fair -- maybe s/Enable/Restore/ as this
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:31:38 -0500
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Re the subject line, this patch does a lot more than just "introduce a
> flag"; AFAICT it actually enables important VFIO functionality, e.g.,
> something like:
>
> vfio/pci: Enable MMIO access for s390 detached VFs
>
> On Thu, Aug
Re the subject line, this patch does a lot more than just "introduce a
flag"; AFAICT it actually enables important VFIO functionality, e.g.,
something like:
vfio/pci: Enable MMIO access for s390 detached VFs
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:40:43AM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> s390x has the notion
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:21:24 -0400
Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 8/13/20 11:40 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> > s390x has the notion of providing VFs to the kernel in a manner
> > where the associated PF is inaccessible other than via firmware.
> > These are not treated as typical VFs and access to
On 8/13/20 11:40 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
s390x has the notion of providing VFs to the kernel in a manner
where the associated PF is inaccessible other than via firmware.
These are not treated as typical VFs and access to them is emulated
by underlying firmware which can still access the PF.
s390x has the notion of providing VFs to the kernel in a manner
where the associated PF is inaccessible other than via firmware.
These are not treated as typical VFs and access to them is emulated
by underlying firmware which can still access the PF. After
the referened commit however these
9 matches
Mail list logo
