From: Zheng Li
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 11:01:48 +0800
> bond_open is not setting the inactive flag correctly for some modes (alb and
> tlb), resulting in error behavior if the bond has been administratively set
> down and then back up. This effect should not occur when slaves are added
> while
>
From: Zheng Li zheng.x...@oracle.com
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 11:01:48 +0800
bond_open is not setting the inactive flag correctly for some modes (alb and
tlb), resulting in error behavior if the bond has been administratively set
down and then back up. This effect should not occur when slaves
Hi Jay,
How do you think about the new patch used USES_PRIMARY, can it be merged
to upstream?
Thanks,
Zheng Li
于 2014年04月02日 11:01, Zheng Li 写道:
> bond_open is not setting the inactive flag correctly for some modes (alb and
> tlb), resulting in error behavior if the bond has been
Hi Jay,
How do you think about the new patch used USES_PRIMARY, can it be merged
to upstream?
Thanks,
Zheng Li
于 2014年04月02日 11:01, Zheng Li 写道:
bond_open is not setting the inactive flag correctly for some modes (alb and
tlb), resulting in error behavior if the bond has been administratively
bond_open is not setting the inactive flag correctly for some modes (alb and
tlb), resulting in error behavior if the bond has been administratively set
down and then back up. This effect should not occur when slaves are added while
the bond is up; it's something that only happens after a down/up
bond_open is not setting the inactive flag correctly for some modes (alb and
tlb), resulting in error behavior if the bond has been administratively set
down and then back up. This effect should not occur when slaves are added while
the bond is up; it's something that only happens after a down/up
6 matches
Mail list logo