On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:52:59PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > And there is no 'Fixes:' tag format checker in checkpatch
>
> I have taken another look at corresponding implementation details.
> Will programming challenges get any more attention?
>
>
> > to check the commit id length too,
>
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:10 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 10:02 +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> > According to submitting-patches.rst, 'Fixes:' tag has a little
> > stricter condition about the one line summary:
> > ...
> > Do not split the tag across multiple
> > lines, tags are
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 10:02 +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> According to submitting-patches.rst, 'Fixes:' tag has a little
> stricter condition about the one line summary:
> ...
> Do not split the tag across multiple
> lines, tags are exempt from the "wrap at 75 columns" rule in order to simplify
>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 08:21:37AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > ...
> > Do not split the tag across multiple
> > lines, tags are exempt from the "wrap at 75 columns" rule in order to
> > simplify
> > parsing scripts
> > ...
>
> I suggest to reformat the quotation.
>
> “…
> Do not split the
> And there is no 'Fixes:' tag format checker in checkpatch
I have taken another look at corresponding implementation details.
Will programming challenges get any more attention?
> to check the commit id length too,
The mentioned script contains the following information.
5 matches
Mail list logo