Re: [PATCH v3] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

2020-06-18 Thread Steven Price
On 17/06/2020 20:57, Rob Herring wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:36 AM Steven Price wrote: On 17/06/2020 15:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v3] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

2020-06-17 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:36 AM Steven Price wrote: > > On 17/06/2020 15:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: > >> Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig > >> > >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>

Re: [PATCH v3] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

2020-06-17 Thread Steven Price
On 17/06/2020 15:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get resources)

Re: [PATCH v3] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

2020-06-17 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: > Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get > > resources) as an error. Also there is no need

Re: [PATCH v3] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

2020-05-27 Thread Alyssa Rosenzweig
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get > resources) as an error. Also there is no need to print regulator errors > twice. > > In case of multiple probe tries this

[PATCH v3] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

2020-05-27 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get resources) as an error. Also there is no need to print regulator errors twice. In case of multiple probe tries this would pollute the dmesg. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Reviewed-by: Steven Price --- Changes since v2: