Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

2017-01-04 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 9:49:51 AM CET Greentime Hu wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 2:05:47 PM CET Greentime Hu wrote: > > > ​I am not sure if atmac and moxa-art are exactly hardware compatible > > though > > >

Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

2017-01-04 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 9:49:51 AM CET Greentime Hu wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 2:05:47 PM CET Greentime Hu wrote: > > > ​I am not sure if atmac and moxa-art are exactly hardware compatible > > though > > > they are based

Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

2017-01-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 2:05:47 PM CET Greentime Hu wrote: > ​I am not sure if atmac and moxa-art are exactly hardware compatible though > they are based on faraday ftmac. > It may be better if we use 2 different device tree binding documents to > describe for these 2 different drivers to use.

Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

2017-01-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 2:05:47 PM CET Greentime Hu wrote: > ​I am not sure if atmac and moxa-art are exactly hardware compatible though > they are based on faraday ftmac. > It may be better if we use 2 different device tree binding documents to > describe for these 2 different drivers to use.

Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

2016-12-31 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday, December 31, 2016 10:48:39 AM CET Florian Fainelli wrote: > > On 12/29/2016 11:37 PM, Greentime Hu wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu > > This is not enough, you need to add a Device Tree binding document under > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ which

Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

2016-12-31 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday, December 31, 2016 10:48:39 AM CET Florian Fainelli wrote: > > On 12/29/2016 11:37 PM, Greentime Hu wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu > > This is not enough, you need to add a Device Tree binding document under > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ which documents this

Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

2016-12-31 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 12/29/2016 11:37 PM, Greentime Hu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu This is not enough, you need to add a Device Tree binding document under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ which documents this compatible string, as well as additional properties that may be

Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

2016-12-31 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 12/29/2016 11:37 PM, Greentime Hu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu This is not enough, you need to add a Device Tree binding document under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ which documents this compatible string, as well as additional properties that may be required to describe

[PATCH v3] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

2016-12-30 Thread Greentime Hu
Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu --- Changes in v3: - Nothing changed in this patch but I have committed andestech to vendor-prefixes.txt. drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c |7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git

[PATCH v3] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

2016-12-30 Thread Greentime Hu
Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu --- Changes in v3: - Nothing changed in this patch but I have committed andestech to vendor-prefixes.txt. drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c |7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c