On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:04:56PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [Added linux-pm to the CC - can you please do so for PM-related patches in
> the future?]
>
> On 4/22/2016 11:07 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >From: Wanpeng Li
> >
> >Sometimes delta_exec is 0 due to
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:04:56PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [Added linux-pm to the CC - can you please do so for PM-related patches in
> the future?]
>
> On 4/22/2016 11:07 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >From: Wanpeng Li
> >
> >Sometimes delta_exec is 0 due to update_curr() is called multiple
[Added linux-pm to the CC - can you please do so for PM-related patches
in the future?]
On 4/22/2016 11:07 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Wanpeng Li
Sometimes delta_exec is 0 due to update_curr() is called multiple times,
this is captured by:
u64 delta_exec =
[Added linux-pm to the CC - can you please do so for PM-related patches
in the future?]
On 4/22/2016 11:07 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Wanpeng Li
Sometimes delta_exec is 0 due to update_curr() is called multiple times,
this is captured by:
u64 delta_exec = rq_clock_task(rq) -
From: Wanpeng Li
Sometimes delta_exec is 0 due to update_curr() is called multiple times,
this is captured by:
u64 delta_exec = rq_clock_task(rq) - curr->se.exec_start;
This patch optimizes the cpufreq update kicker by bailing out when nothing
changed, it will
From: Wanpeng Li
Sometimes delta_exec is 0 due to update_curr() is called multiple times,
this is captured by:
u64 delta_exec = rq_clock_task(rq) - curr->se.exec_start;
This patch optimizes the cpufreq update kicker by bailing out when nothing
changed, it will benefit the upcoming
6 matches
Mail list logo