On 3/8/21 4:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:29 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
wrote:
On 3/5/21 11:22 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:57 PM James Bottomley
wrote:
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 12:52 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
[...]
This draft seems fine to me,
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:29 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
wrote:
> On 3/5/21 11:22 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:57 PM James Bottomley
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 12:52 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> This draft seems fine to me, but there is
On 3/5/21 11:22 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:57 PM James Bottomley
wrote:
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 12:52 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
[...]
This draft seems fine to me, but there is a small logistical blocker
at the moment which means I can't merge this until -rc2 is rel
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:57 PM James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 12:52 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> [...]
> > This draft seems fine to me, but there is a small logistical blocker
> > at the moment which means I can't merge this until -rc2 is released,
> > which likely means this coming
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 12:52 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
[...]
> This draft seems fine to me, but there is a small logistical blocker
> at the moment which means I can't merge this until -rc2 is released,
> which likely means this coming Monday. The problem is that this
> patch relies on code that wen
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:37 AM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
wrote:
>
> SELinux stores the configuration state and the policy capabilities
> in kernel memory. Changes to this data at runtime would have an impact
> on the security guarantees provided by SELinux. Measuring this data
> through IMA subs
On 3/4/21 5:45 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:20 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
wrote:
On 2/12/21 8:37 AM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
Hi Paul,
SELinux stores the configuration state and the policy capabilities
in kernel memory. Changes to this data at runtime would have an i
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:20 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
wrote:
> On 2/12/21 8:37 AM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> > SELinux stores the configuration state and the policy capabilities
> > in kernel memory. Changes to this data at runtime would have an impact
> > on the security g
On 2/12/21 8:37 AM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
Hi Paul,
SELinux stores the configuration state and the policy capabilities
in kernel memory. Changes to this data at runtime would have an impact
on the security guarantees provided by SELinux. Measuring this data
through IMA subsystem provi
SELinux stores the configuration state and the policy capabilities
in kernel memory. Changes to this data at runtime would have an impact
on the security guarantees provided by SELinux. Measuring this data
through IMA subsystem provides a tamper-resistant way for
an attestation service to remotel
10 matches
Mail list logo