Hello Zhang,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:35:25PM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
> Hello Minchan,
>
> Nice work. It seems I forgot to reply your mail in the first RFC version
> of the patch, so I just review this new one.
>
> On 04/07/2014 10:51 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Linux doesn't have an
Hello Zhang,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:35:25PM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
Hello Minchan,
Nice work. It seems I forgot to reply your mail in the first RFC version
of the patch, so I just review this new one.
On 04/07/2014 10:51 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Linux doesn't have an ability to
Hello Minchan,
Nice work. It seems I forgot to reply your mail in the first RFC version
of the patch, so I just review this new one.
On 04/07/2014 10:51 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Linux doesn't have an ability to free pages lazy while other OS
> already have been supported that named by
Hello Minchan,
Nice work. It seems I forgot to reply your mail in the first RFC version
of the patch, so I just review this new one.
On 04/07/2014 10:51 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Linux doesn't have an ability to free pages lazy while other OS
already have been supported that named by
Linux doesn't have an ability to free pages lazy while other OS
already have been supported that named by madvise(MADV_FREE).
The gain is clear that kernel can discard freed pages rather than
swapping out or OOM if memory pressure happens.
Without memory pressure, freed pages would be reused by
Linux doesn't have an ability to free pages lazy while other OS
already have been supported that named by madvise(MADV_FREE).
The gain is clear that kernel can discard freed pages rather than
swapping out or OOM if memory pressure happens.
Without memory pressure, freed pages would be reused by
6 matches
Mail list logo
