RE: [PATCH v3] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-11 Thread Alexander.Steffen
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 12:37:39AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 05:21:32PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > > > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the > number > > > of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the >

RE: [PATCH v3] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-11 Thread Alexander.Steffen
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 12:37:39AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 05:21:32PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > > > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the > number > > > of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the >

Re: [PATCH v3] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-09 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 12:37:39AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 05:21:32PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the number > > of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the > >

Re: [PATCH v3] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-09 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 12:37:39AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 05:21:32PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the number > > of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the > >

Re: [PATCH v3] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-08 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 05:21:32PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the number > of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the > commandSize field in the TPM header that is encoded within the buffer. >

Re: [PATCH v3] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-08 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 05:21:32PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the number > of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the > commandSize field in the TPM header that is encoded within the buffer. >

[PATCH v3] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-08 Thread Alexander Steffen
tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the number of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the commandSize field in the TPM header that is encoded within the buffer. Therefore, ensure that a) enough data has been written to the buffer, so that the

[PATCH v3] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-08 Thread Alexander Steffen
tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the number of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the commandSize field in the TPM header that is encoded within the buffer. Therefore, ensure that a) enough data has been written to the buffer, so that the