On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 05:56:59PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Neil Horman
> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:19:57 -0500
>
> > The SCTP protocol has several deprecation warnings in its setsockopt path
> > that
> > can be triggered by unprivlidged users. Since these are not ratelimited,
> >
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 05:56:59PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:19:57 -0500
The SCTP protocol has several deprecation warnings in its setsockopt path
that
can be triggered by unprivlidged users. Since these are not
From: Neil Horman
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:19:57 -0500
> The SCTP protocol has several deprecation warnings in its setsockopt path that
> can be triggered by unprivlidged users. Since these are not ratelimited, we
> can
> spam the logs quite easily here. Since these are all deprecation
From: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:19:57 -0500
The SCTP protocol has several deprecation warnings in its setsockopt path that
can be triggered by unprivlidged users. Since these are not ratelimited, we
can
spam the logs quite easily here. Since these are all
The SCTP protocol has several deprecation warnings in its setsockopt path that
can be triggered by unprivlidged users. Since these are not ratelimited, we can
spam the logs quite easily here. Since these are all deprecation warnings, and
that type of warning isn't uncommon in the rest of the
The SCTP protocol has several deprecation warnings in its setsockopt path that
can be triggered by unprivlidged users. Since these are not ratelimited, we can
spam the logs quite easily here. Since these are all deprecation warnings, and
that type of warning isn't uncommon in the rest of the
6 matches
Mail list logo
