On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:43:31PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 22 November 2017 at 20:36, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patches introduces new process_vmsplice system call that combines
> > functionality of process_vm_read and
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:43:31PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 22 November 2017 at 20:36, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patches introduces new process_vmsplice system call that combines
> > functionality of process_vm_read and vmsplice.
> >
> > It
Hi Mike,
On 22 November 2017 at 20:36, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Yossi Kuperman
>
> Hi,
>
> This patches introduces new process_vmsplice system call that combines
> functionality of process_vm_read and vmsplice.
>
> It allows to map the memory of
Hi Mike,
On 22 November 2017 at 20:36, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Yossi Kuperman
>
> Hi,
>
> This patches introduces new process_vmsplice system call that combines
> functionality of process_vm_read and vmsplice.
>
> It allows to map the memory of another process into a pipe, similarly to
>
From: Yossi Kuperman
Hi,
This patches introduces new process_vmsplice system call that combines
functionality of process_vm_read and vmsplice.
It allows to map the memory of another process into a pipe, similarly to
what vmsplice does for its own address space.
The patch
From: Yossi Kuperman
Hi,
This patches introduces new process_vmsplice system call that combines
functionality of process_vm_read and vmsplice.
It allows to map the memory of another process into a pipe, similarly to
what vmsplice does for its own address space.
The patch 2/4 ("vm: add a
6 matches
Mail list logo