On 4/15/21 1:10 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:20:22PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
With memory accounting disable, the run time was 2.848s. With memory
accounting enabled, the run times with the application of various
patches in the patchset were:
Applied patches Run
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:20:22PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> With memory accounting disable, the run time was 2.848s. With memory
> accounting enabled, the run times with the application of various
> patches in the patchset were:
>
> Applied patches Run time Accounting overhead Overhead
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 09:17:37AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> I was focusing on your kernel module benchmark in testing my patch. I will
> try out your pgbench benchmark to see if there can be other tuning that can
> be done.
Thanks a lot!
> BTW, how many numa nodes does your test machine? I
On 4/14/21 11:26 PM, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
Hi Longman,
Thank you for your patches.
I rerun the benchmark with your patches, it seems that the reduction
is small... The total duration of sendto() and recvfrom() system call
during the benchmark are as follows.
- sendto
- v5.8 vanilla:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:20:22PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> v3:
> - Add missing "inline" qualifier to the alternate mod_obj_stock_state()
> in patch 3.
> - Remove redundant current_obj_stock() call in patch 5.
>
> v2:
> - Fix bug found by test robot in patch 5.
> - Update cover
v3:
- Add missing "inline" qualifier to the alternate mod_obj_stock_state()
in patch 3.
- Remove redundant current_obj_stock() call in patch 5.
v2:
- Fix bug found by test robot in patch 5.
- Update cover letter and commit logs.
With the recent introduction of the new slab memory
6 matches
Mail list logo
