Resending due to HTML.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 8:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 29-07-19, 13:12, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 2:24 AM Viresh Kumar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 18-07-19, 21:12, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:37 PM Viresh Kumar
>
On 29-07-19, 13:12, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 2:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 18-07-19, 21:12, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:37 PM Viresh Kumar
> > > wrote:
> > > > I would like
> > > > to put this data in the GPU OPP table only. What about
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 2:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 18-07-19, 21:12, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:37 PM Viresh Kumar
> > wrote:
> > > I would like
> > > to put this data in the GPU OPP table only. What about putting a
> > > range in the GPU OPP table for the Bandw
On 18-07-19, 21:12, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:37 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > I would like
> > to put this data in the GPU OPP table only. What about putting a
> > range in the GPU OPP table for the Bandwidth if it can change so much
> > for the same frequency.
>
> I don't
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:37 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> I know you have explained lots of things earlier as well, but they are
> available over multiple threads and I don't know where to reply now :)
>
> Lets have proper discussion (once again) here and be done with it.
> Sorry for the trouble of
I know you have explained lots of things earlier as well, but they are
available over multiple threads and I don't know where to reply now :)
Lets have proper discussion (once again) here and be done with it.
Sorry for the trouble of explaining things again.
On 17-07-19, 13:34, Saravana Kannan wr
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 3:32 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 02-07-19, 18:10, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > Interconnects and interconnect paths quantify their performance levels in
> > terms of bandwidth and not in terms of frequency. So similar to how we have
> > frequency based OPP tables in DT and
On 02-07-19, 18:10, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Interconnects and interconnect paths quantify their performance levels in
> terms of bandwidth and not in terms of frequency. So similar to how we have
> frequency based OPP tables in DT and in the OPP framework, we need
> bandwidth OPP table support in
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 02-07-19, 18:10, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > Interconnects and interconnect paths quantify their performance levels in
> > terms of bandwidth and not in terms of frequency. So similar to how we have
> > frequency based OPP tables in DT and
On 02-07-19, 18:10, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Interconnects and interconnect paths quantify their performance levels in
> terms of bandwidth and not in terms of frequency. So similar to how we have
> frequency based OPP tables in DT and in the OPP framework, we need
> bandwidth OPP table support in
Interconnects and interconnect paths quantify their performance levels in
terms of bandwidth and not in terms of frequency. So similar to how we have
frequency based OPP tables in DT and in the OPP framework, we need
bandwidth OPP table support in the OPP framework and in DT. Since there can
be mor
11 matches
Mail list logo
