Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] usb: add support for Intel dual role port mux

2016-03-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 08:20:43AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > > > On 03/11/2016 08:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:53:41PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > >> Intel SOC chips are featured with USB dual role. The host role is > >> provided by Intel xHCI IP, and the gadget rol

Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] usb: add support for Intel dual role port mux

2016-03-10 Thread Lu Baolu
On 03/11/2016 08:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:53:41PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >> Intel SOC chips are featured with USB dual role. The host role is >> provided by Intel xHCI IP, and the gadget role is provided by IP >> from designware. Tablet platform designs always

Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] usb: add support for Intel dual role port mux

2016-03-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:53:41PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Intel SOC chips are featured with USB dual role. The host role is > provided by Intel xHCI IP, and the gadget role is provided by IP > from designware. Tablet platform designs always share a single > port for both host and gadget controlle

[PATCH v3 0/7] usb: add support for Intel dual role port mux

2016-03-07 Thread Lu Baolu
Intel SOC chips are featured with USB dual role. The host role is provided by Intel xHCI IP, and the gadget role is provided by IP from designware. Tablet platform designs always share a single port for both host and gadget controllers. There is a mux to switch the port to the right controller acco