On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 23:58:45 +0300 Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
[]
>> For now (so far no more comments) it is only couple of trivia fixes
>> (removing useless comments). Would you like to resend whole series or
>> just fixup would be
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 23:58:45 +0300 Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:33:30 -0400 "John W. Linville"
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:42:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> > The introduced function
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:33:30 -0400 "John W. Linville"
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:42:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > The introduced function is a kind of opposite to string_unescape. We have
>> > several users of such
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:08:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:33:30 -0400 "John W. Linville"
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:42:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > The introduced function is a kind of opposite to string_unescape. We have
> > > several
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:33:30 -0400 "John W. Linville"
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:42:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The introduced function is a kind of opposite to string_unescape. We have
> > several users of such functionality each of them created custom
> > implementation.
Any objections? Do you (Andy) want me to merge this through the
wireless tree?
John
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:42:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The introduced function is a kind of opposite to string_unescape. We have
> several users of such functionality each of them created custom
>
Any objections? Do you (Andy) want me to merge this through the
wireless tree?
John
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:42:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
The introduced function is a kind of opposite to string_unescape. We have
several users of such functionality each of them created custom
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:33:30 -0400 John W. Linville linvi...@tuxdriver.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:42:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
The introduced function is a kind of opposite to string_unescape. We have
several users of such functionality each of them created custom
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:08:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:33:30 -0400 John W. Linville
linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:42:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
The introduced function is a kind of opposite to string_unescape. We have
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:33:30 -0400 John W. Linville
linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:42:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
The introduced function is a kind of opposite to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 23:58:45 +0300 Andy Shevchenko andy.shevche...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:33:30 -0400 John W. Linville
linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:42:41PM
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 23:58:45 +0300 Andy Shevchenko
andy.shevche...@gmail.com wrote:
[]
For now (so far no more comments) it is only couple of trivia fixes
(removing useless comments). Would you like to resend
The introduced function is a kind of opposite to string_unescape. We have
several users of such functionality each of them created custom implementation.
The series contains clean up of test suite, adding new call, and switching few
users to use it via %*pE specifier.
Test suite covers all of
The introduced function is a kind of opposite to string_unescape. We have
several users of such functionality each of them created custom implementation.
The series contains clean up of test suite, adding new call, and switching few
users to use it via %*pE specifier.
Test suite covers all of
14 matches
Mail list logo
