On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 07:30:32PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 22/09/2020 19:14, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 03:46:29PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> >
> >> I agree, that makes sense.
> >> But assuming Oded actually goes and implements all the needed verbs to get
> >> a
On 22/09/2020 19:14, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 03:46:29PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
>
>> I agree, that makes sense.
>> But assuming Oded actually goes and implements all the needed verbs to get a
>> basic functional libibverbs provider (assuming their HW can do it
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 03:46:29PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> I agree, that makes sense.
> But assuming Oded actually goes and implements all the needed verbs to get a
> basic functional libibverbs provider (assuming their HW can do it somehow), is
> it really useful if no one is going to use
On 22/09/2020 14:41, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:22:02PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
>
>> What is considered a RoCE port in this case if it's not compliant with RoCE?
>> Sounds like it's an implementation of RDMA over ethernet, not RoCE.
>> Does GAUDI support UD/RC/.. QPs?
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:20:53PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> I'd wager the only reason you expose the netdevs at all is for link
> settings, stats, packet capture and debug. You'd never run TCP traffic
> over those links. And you're fighting against using Linux APIs for the
> only real
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:22:02PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> What is considered a RoCE port in this case if it's not compliant with RoCE?
> Sounds like it's an implementation of RDMA over ethernet, not RoCE.
> Does GAUDI support UD/RC/.. QPs? Is it using a proprietary wire protocol?
> (BTW,
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 08:52:39 -0300 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I don't like this idea of backdooring a bunch of proprietary closed
> source RDMA userspace through drivers/misc, and if you don't have a
> clear idea how to get something equal for drivers/misc you should not
> accept the H_IOCTL_NIC.
>
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:47:02AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > If not, what open source userspace are you going to ask them to
> > present to merge the kernel side into misc?
>
> I don't think that they have a userspace api to their rdma feature from
> what I understand, but I could be
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:22:02PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 18/09/2020 18:28, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 06:15:52PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> >
> >> I'm sorry, but you won't be able to convince me here that I need to
> >> "enslave" my entire code to RDMA, just
On 18/09/2020 18:28, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 06:15:52PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry, but you won't be able to convince me here that I need to
>> "enslave" my entire code to RDMA, just because my ASIC "also" has some
>> RDMA ports.
>
> You can't recreate
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:05:39PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 11:47 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 04:22:35PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 07:27:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > It's probably
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 11:47 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 04:22:35PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 07:27:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > It's probably heresy, but why do I need to integrate into the RDMA
> > > > subsystem ?
>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:47:58AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:21 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:02:39AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 16,
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 04:22:35PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 07:27:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > It's probably heresy, but why do I need to integrate into the RDMA
> > > subsystem ?
> > > I understand your reasoning about networking (Ethernet) as the
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 07:27:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > It's probably heresy, but why do I need to integrate into the RDMA
> > subsystem ?
> > I understand your reasoning about networking (Ethernet) as the driver
> > connects to the kernel networking stack (netdev), but with RDMA
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 07:43:28PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> It's probably heresy, but why do I need to integrate into the RDMA subsystem ?
Hi Oded
I don't know the RDMA subsystem at all. So i will give a more generic
answer. Are you reinventing things which a subsystem core already has?
The
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 07:43:28PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:30 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:20:03AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:40:20AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 18,
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:30 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:20:03AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:40:20AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:19:05PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > So we do have an
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 10:30:12AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:20:03AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:40:20AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:19:05PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > So we do
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:20:03AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:40:20AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:19:05PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > So we do have an open-source library called hl-thunk, which uses our
> > > > driver
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:40:20AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:19:05PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > So we do have an open-source library called hl-thunk, which uses our
> > > driver and indeed that was part of the requirement.
> > > It is similar to libdrm.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:19:05PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > So we do have an open-source library called hl-thunk, which uses our
> > driver and indeed that was part of the requirement.
> > It is similar to libdrm.
> > Here is the link:
> > https://github.com/HabanaAI/hl-thunk
>
> Are you
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 06:15:52PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> I'm sorry, but you won't be able to convince me here that I need to
> "enslave" my entire code to RDMA, just because my ASIC "also" has some
> RDMA ports.
You can't recreate common shared subsystems in a driver just because
you don't
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 6:07 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 05:45:21PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>
> > Any access by the device's engines to the host memory is done via our
> > device's MMU. Our MMU supports multiple ASIDs - Address Space IDs. The
> > kernel driver is
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 05:45:21PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> Any access by the device's engines to the host memory is done via our
> device's MMU. Our MMU supports multiple ASIDs - Address Space IDs. The
> kernel driver is assigned ASID 0, while the user is assigned ASID 1.
> We can support up
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:19 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 05:12:04PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:59 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:49:25PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:26 PM
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 05:12:04PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:59 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:49:25PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:26 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:59 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:49:25PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:26 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:02:24PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > >
> > > > The problem with MR is that
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:49:25PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:26 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:02:24PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> >
> > > The problem with MR is that the API doesn't let us return a new VA. It
> > > forces us to use the
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:26 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:02:24PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>
> > The problem with MR is that the API doesn't let us return a new VA. It
> > forces us to use the original VA that the Host OS allocated.
>
> If using the common MR API
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 04:02:24PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> The problem with MR is that the API doesn't let us return a new VA. It
> forces us to use the original VA that the Host OS allocated.
If using the common MR API you'd have to assign a unique linear range
in the single device address
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:31:51PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:19 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:07:19PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:03 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:50 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:34:54PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > > Another example is that the submission of WQ is done through our QMAN
> > > > mechanism and is NOT mapped to userspace (due to the restrictions you
> > > > mentioned
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:34:54PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > Another example is that the submission of WQ is done through our QMAN
> > > mechanism and is NOT mapped to userspace (due to the restrictions you
> > > mentioned above and other restrictions).
> >
> > Sure, other RDMA drivers also
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:16 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:59:28PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:56 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:36:10PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> > > > On 17/09/2020 20:18, Jason
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:19 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:07:19PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:03 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:56:09PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:52 PM Leon
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:07:19PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:03 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:56:09PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:52 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:59:28PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:56 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:36:10PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> > > On 17/09/2020 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:46:58PM +0300, Oded
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:36 PM Gal Pressman wrote:
>
> On 17/09/2020 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:46:58PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> >> infrastructure for communication between multiple accelerators. Same
> >> as Nvidia uses NVlink, we use RDMA that we have
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:03 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:56:09PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:52 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:36:10PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> > > > On 17/09/2020 20:18, Jason
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:56:09PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:52 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:36:10PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> > > On 17/09/2020 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:46:58PM +0300, Oded
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:00 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:10:08PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is the second version of the patch-set to upstream the GAUDI NIC code
> > into the habanalabs driver.
> >
> > The only modification from v2 is in the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:10:08PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the second version of the patch-set to upstream the GAUDI NIC code
> into the habanalabs driver.
>
> The only modification from v2 is in the ethtool patch (patch 12). Details
> are in that patch's commit message.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:56 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:36:10PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> > On 17/09/2020 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:46:58PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > >> infrastructure for communication between multiple
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:52 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:36:10PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> > On 17/09/2020 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:46:58PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > >> infrastructure for communication between multiple
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:36:10PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 17/09/2020 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:46:58PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> >> infrastructure for communication between multiple accelerators. Same
> >> as Nvidia uses NVlink, we use RDMA that we
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:36:10PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 17/09/2020 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:46:58PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> >> infrastructure for communication between multiple accelerators. Same
> >> as Nvidia uses NVlink, we use RDMA that we
On 17/09/2020 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:46:58PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> infrastructure for communication between multiple accelerators. Same
>> as Nvidia uses NVlink, we use RDMA that we have inside our ASIC.
>> The RDMA implementation we did does NOT support
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:46:58PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> infrastructure for communication between multiple accelerators. Same
> as Nvidia uses NVlink, we use RDMA that we have inside our ASIC.
> The RDMA implementation we did does NOT support some basic RDMA
> IBverbs (such as MR and PD) and
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 10:22 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:02:39AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:41 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:36:23AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:25 AM
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:47:58AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:21 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:02:39AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:41 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 16,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:21 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:02:39AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:41 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:36:23AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:02:39AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:41 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:36:23AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:25 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 15,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:41 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:36:23AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:25 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:49:12PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:36:23AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:25 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:49:12PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:42 PM David Miller wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Oded Gabbay
> > > >
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:25 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:49:12PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:42 PM David Miller wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Oded Gabbay
> > > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:10:08 +0300
> > >
> > > > This is the second version
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:49:12PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:42 PM David Miller wrote:
> >
> > From: Oded Gabbay
> > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:10:08 +0300
> >
> > > This is the second version of the patch-set to upstream the GAUDI NIC code
> > > into the habanalabs
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 1:34 AM David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Oded Gabbay
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:20:12 +0300
>
> > I completely understand but you didn't answer my question. How come
> > there are drivers which create netdev objects, and specifically sgi-xp
> > in misc (but I also saw it in
From: Oded Gabbay
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:20:12 +0300
> I completely understand but you didn't answer my question. How come
> there are drivers which create netdev objects, and specifically sgi-xp
> in misc (but I also saw it in usb drivers) that live outside
> drivers/net ? Why doesn't your
From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 23:37:35 +0200
>> I understand your point of view but If my H/W doesn't support the
>> basic requirements of the RDMA infrastructure and interfaces, then
>> really there is nothing I can do about it. I can't use them.
>
> It is up to the RDMA people to
From: Oded Gabbay
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:43:00 +0300
> I honestly don't know and I admit we didn't look at the dates of when
> these drivers were introduced.
Please do research when you make claims in the future, thank you.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:37 AM Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> > I completely understand but you didn't answer my question. How come
> > there are drivers which create netdev objects, and specifically sgi-xp
> > in misc (but I also saw it in usb drivers) that live outside
> > drivers/net ? Why doesn't
> I completely understand but you didn't answer my question. How come
> there are drivers which create netdev objects, and specifically sgi-xp
> in misc (but I also saw it in usb drivers) that live outside
> drivers/net ? Why doesn't your request apply to them as well ?
> When we wrote the code,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:04 AM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 23:46:58 +0300 Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:35 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:10:08 +0300 Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > This is the second version of the
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:10:08 +0300 Oded Gabbay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the second version of the patch-set to upstream the GAUDI NIC code
> into the habanalabs driver.
>
> The only modification from v2 is in the ethtool patch (patch 12). Details
> are in that patch's commit message.
You
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 23:46:58 +0300 Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:35 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:10:08 +0300 Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This is the second version of the patch-set to upstream the GAUDI NIC code
> > > into the habanalabs
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:42 PM David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Oded Gabbay
> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:10:08 +0300
>
> > This is the second version of the patch-set to upstream the GAUDI NIC code
> > into the habanalabs driver.
> >
> > The only modification from v2 is in the ethtool patch (patch
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:35 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:10:08 +0300 Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is the second version of the patch-set to upstream the GAUDI NIC code
> > into the habanalabs driver.
> >
> > The only modification from v2 is in the ethtool
From: Oded Gabbay
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:10:08 +0300
> This is the second version of the patch-set to upstream the GAUDI NIC code
> into the habanalabs driver.
>
> The only modification from v2 is in the ethtool patch (patch 12). Details
> are in that patch's commit message.
>
> Link to v2
Hello,
This is the second version of the patch-set to upstream the GAUDI NIC code
into the habanalabs driver.
The only modification from v2 is in the ethtool patch (patch 12). Details
are in that patch's commit message.
Link to v2 cover letter:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/12/201
Thanks,
Oded
70 matches
Mail list logo
