> > +int copro_data_segment(struct mm_struct *mm, u64 ea, u64 *esid, u64 *vsid);
>
> This function is otherwise not included in this patch, so it should
> probably be removed (as the next patch removes it anyway).
Yeah, looks like I screwed it up slightly in the packing of these
patches.
Hi Mikey,
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:48:07 +1100 Michael Neuling wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/copro.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/copro.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..2858108
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/copro.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/*
> + *
From: Ian Munsie
Currently spu_handle_mm_fault() is in the cell platform.
This code is generically useful for other non-cell co-processors on powerpc.
This patch moves this function out of the cell platform into arch/powerpc/mm so
that others may use it.
Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie
From: Ian Munsie imun...@au1.ibm.com
Currently spu_handle_mm_fault() is in the cell platform.
This code is generically useful for other non-cell co-processors on powerpc.
This patch moves this function out of the cell platform into arch/powerpc/mm so
that others may use it.
Signed-off-by: Ian
Hi Mikey,
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:48:07 +1100 Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/copro.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/copro.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..2858108
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/copro.h
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/*
+
+int copro_data_segment(struct mm_struct *mm, u64 ea, u64 *esid, u64 *vsid);
This function is otherwise not included in this patch, so it should
probably be removed (as the next patch removes it anyway).
Yeah, looks like I screwed it up slightly in the packing of these
patches.
Thanks.
6 matches
Mail list logo
