Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-16 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:39:33PM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Steffen Maier wrote: > > Hi Johannes, > > > > On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > > On Fri,

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-16 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:39:33PM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Steffen Maier wrote: > > Hi Johannes, > > > > On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > > On Fri,

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-15 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Steffen Maier wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-15 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Steffen Maier wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-15 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Steffen Maier wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-15 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Steffen Maier wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-15 Thread Steffen Maier
Hi Johannes, On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: Hm, still behaves for me like

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-15 Thread Steffen Maier
Hi Johannes, On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: Hm, still behaves for me like

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-15 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > > > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-15 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > > > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-03 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:17:51AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > > > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-03 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:17:51AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > > > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=147637177902937=2 > > Hi Steffen, > > Can you please try the following on

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-11-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=147637177902937=2 > > Hi Steffen, > > Can you please try the following on

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-10-25 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=147637177902937=2 > > Hi Steffen, > > Can you please try the following on

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-10-25 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=147637177902937=2 > > Hi Steffen, > > Can you please try the following on

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-10-14 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=147637177902937=2 Hi Steffen, Can you please try the following on top of 2/16? diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-10-14 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=147637177902937=2 Hi Steffen, Can you please try the following on top of 2/16? diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-10-13 Thread Steffen Maier
Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=147637177902937=2 On 10/13/2016 05:00 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: Don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly, but use helper variables bsg_request and bsg_reply. This will be helpfull when

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-10-13 Thread Steffen Maier
Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=147637177902937=2 On 10/13/2016 05:00 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: Don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly, but use helper variables bsg_request and bsg_reply. This will be helpfull when

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-10-13 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=147637177902937=2 > Well given what you've wrote for v2 it's kinda expected. Byte, Johannes -- Johannes Thumshirn

Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-10-13 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=147637177902937=2 > Well given what you've wrote for v2 it's kinda expected. Byte, Johannes -- Johannes Thumshirn

[PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-10-13 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
Don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly, but use helper variables bsg_request and bsg_reply. This will be helpfull when transitioning to bsg-lib. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke ---

[PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly

2016-10-13 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
Don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly, but use helper variables bsg_request and bsg_reply. This will be helpfull when transitioning to bsg-lib. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke --- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c | 9 +-