On Monday 11 February 2013 04:59 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
>
> On 24/01/13 10:50, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arc/Kconfig b/arch/arc/Kconfig
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..b0b09ae
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arc/Kconfig
>> @@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
>> +#
>> +#
Hi Vineet,
On 24/01/13 10:50, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arc/Kconfig b/arch/arc/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..b0b09ae
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arc/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) 2004, 2007-2010, 2011-2012 Synopsys, Inc. (www.synopsys.com)
>
Hi Vineet,
On 24/01/13 10:50, Vineet Gupta wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arc/Kconfig b/arch/arc/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000..b0b09ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arc/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2004, 2007-2010, 2011-2012 Synopsys, Inc. (www.synopsys.com)
+#
+#
On Monday 11 February 2013 04:59 PM, James Hogan wrote:
Hi Vineet,
On 24/01/13 10:50, Vineet Gupta wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arc/Kconfig b/arch/arc/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000..b0b09ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arc/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2004,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 07:15:07PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 January 2013 12:14 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:59:36AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >> Hi Sam,
> >>
> >> On Thursday 24 January 2013 04:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >>> Arnd in his review
On Tuesday 29 January 2013 12:14 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:59:36AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> Hi Sam,
>>
>> On Thursday 24 January 2013 04:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>> Arnd in his review pointed out that arch Kconfig organisation has several
>>> deficiencies:
>>>
On Tuesday 29 January 2013 12:14 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:59:36AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Hi Sam,
On Thursday 24 January 2013 04:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Arnd in his review pointed out that arch Kconfig organisation has several
deficiencies:
* Build time
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 07:15:07PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Tuesday 29 January 2013 12:14 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:59:36AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Hi Sam,
On Thursday 24 January 2013 04:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Arnd in his review pointed out that arch
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:59:36AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> On Thursday 24 January 2013 04:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > Arnd in his review pointed out that arch Kconfig organisation has several
> > deficiencies:
> >
> > * Build time entries for things which can be runtime
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:59:36AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Hi Sam,
On Thursday 24 January 2013 04:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Arnd in his review pointed out that arch Kconfig organisation has several
deficiencies:
* Build time entries for things which can be runtime extracted from
Hi Sam,
On Thursday 24 January 2013 04:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Arnd in his review pointed out that arch Kconfig organisation has several
> deficiencies:
>
> * Build time entries for things which can be runtime extracted from DT
> (e.g. SDRAM size, core clk frequency..)
> * Not
Hi Sam,
On Thursday 24 January 2013 04:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Arnd in his review pointed out that arch Kconfig organisation has several
deficiencies:
* Build time entries for things which can be runtime extracted from DT
(e.g. SDRAM size, core clk frequency..)
* Not
Arnd in his review pointed out that arch Kconfig organisation has several
deficiencies:
* Build time entries for things which can be runtime extracted from DT
(e.g. SDRAM size, core clk frequency..)
* Not multi-platform-image-build friendly (choice .. endchoice constructs)
* cpu variants
Arnd in his review pointed out that arch Kconfig organisation has several
deficiencies:
* Build time entries for things which can be runtime extracted from DT
(e.g. SDRAM size, core clk frequency..)
* Not multi-platform-image-build friendly (choice .. endchoice constructs)
* cpu variants
14 matches
Mail list logo
