On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 05:26:30PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 11/4/18 8:45 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Instead of accessing fields of the command header through offsets to
> > the raw buffer, it is a better idea to use the header struct pointer
> > that is already used elsewhere in the
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 05:26:30PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 11/4/18 8:45 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Instead of accessing fields of the command header through offsets to
> > the raw buffer, it is a better idea to use the header struct pointer
> > that is already used elsewhere in the
On 11/4/18 8:45 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
Instead of accessing fields of the command header through offsets to
the raw buffer, it is a better idea to use the header struct pointer
that is already used elsewhere in the function.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
---
On 11/4/18 8:45 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
Instead of accessing fields of the command header through offsets to
the raw buffer, it is a better idea to use the header struct pointer
that is already used elsewhere in the function.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
---
Instead of accessing fields of the command header through offsets to
the raw buffer, it is a better idea to use the header struct pointer
that is already used elsewhere in the function.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
Instead of accessing fields of the command header through offsets to
the raw buffer, it is a better idea to use the header struct pointer
that is already used elsewhere in the function.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
6 matches
Mail list logo