On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Romain Perier wrote:
> 2014-11-11 16:01 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely :
>> So, to be a little pendantic, the 'ti,' prefix is basically just for
>> backwards compatibility with the old binding, and that old binding is
>> only used on palmas.c, tps65*.c and
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-11-11 16:01 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org:
So, to be a little pendantic, the 'ti,' prefix is basically just for
backwards compatibility with the old binding, and that old binding is
only used on
2014-11-11 16:01 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely :
> So, to be a little pendantic, the 'ti,' prefix is basically just for
> backwards compatibility with the old binding, and that old binding is
> only used on palmas.c, tps65*.c and twl4030-power.c, correct?
No, the backward compatibility here is only
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:23:02 +
, Romain Perier
wrote:
> It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff
> capability").
> As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
> old established property name, without the vendor prefix. Problem
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:23:02 +
, Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com
wrote:
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 (of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability).
As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
old established property name, without the vendor
2014-11-11 16:01 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org:
So, to be a little pendantic, the 'ti,' prefix is basically just for
backwards compatibility with the old binding, and that old binding is
only used on palmas.c, tps65*.c and twl4030-power.c, correct?
No, the backward
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability").
As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
old established property name, without the vendor prefix. Problem being that
the word "source" usually tends to be used for inputs and
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 (of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability).
As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
old established property name, without the vendor prefix. Problem being that
the word source usually tends to be used for inputs and that
8 matches
Mail list logo
