On 11.02.21 13:57, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:18:56 +0100
David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 09.02.21 16:43, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
Extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return the pointer to the valid leaf
DAT table entry, or to the invalid entry.
Also return some flags in the
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:18:56 +0100
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.02.21 16:43, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > Extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return the pointer to the valid leaf
> > DAT table entry, or to the invalid entry.
> >
> > Also return some flags in the lower bits of the address:
> >
On 09.02.21 16:43, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
Extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return the pointer to the valid leaf
DAT table entry, or to the invalid entry.
Also return some flags in the lower bits of the address:
DAT_PROT: indicates that DAT protection applies because of the
protection
On 2/9/21 4:43 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> Extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return the pointer to the valid leaf
> DAT table entry, or to the invalid entry.
>
> Also return some flags in the lower bits of the address:
> DAT_PROT: indicates that DAT protection applies because of the
>
Extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return the pointer to the valid leaf
DAT table entry, or to the invalid entry.
Also return some flags in the lower bits of the address:
DAT_PROT: indicates that DAT protection applies because of the
protection bit in the segment (or, if EDAT, region)
5 matches
Mail list logo