> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@alien8.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:56 AM
...
>
> Oh well, here's an updated version with those suggestions incorporated.
>
> Also, I've carved out the common functionality into a _log_error_bank() which
> is more
> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@alien8.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:56 AM
...
>
> Oh well, here's an updated version with those suggestions incorporated.
>
> Also, I've carved out the common functionality into a _log_error_bank() which
> is more
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:16:11PM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam
>
> We have support for the new SMCA MCA_DE{STAT,ADDR} registers in Linux. So
> we've used these registers in place of MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} on SMCA systems.
> However, the guidance for
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:16:11PM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam
>
> We have support for the new SMCA MCA_DE{STAT,ADDR} registers in Linux. So
> we've used these registers in place of MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} on SMCA systems.
> However, the guidance for current implementations of
From: Yazen Ghannam
We have support for the new SMCA MCA_DE{STAT,ADDR} registers in Linux. So
we've used these registers in place of MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} on SMCA systems.
However, the guidance for current implementations of SMCA is to continue
using MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} and to
From: Yazen Ghannam
We have support for the new SMCA MCA_DE{STAT,ADDR} registers in Linux. So
we've used these registers in place of MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} on SMCA systems.
However, the guidance for current implementations of SMCA is to continue
using MCA_{STATUS,ADDR} and to use MCA_DE{STAT,ADDR}
6 matches
Mail list logo