Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: add optional dma property

2017-11-18 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:27:46 -0600 Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:56:45PM +0200, Eugen Hristev wrote: > > Added property for DMA configuration of the device. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > > --- > > Changes in v3: > >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: add optional dma property

2017-11-18 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:27:46 -0600 Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:56:45PM +0200, Eugen Hristev wrote: > > Added property for DMA configuration of the device. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > > --- > > Changes in v3: > > None, but we discussed on the ML about whether we

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: add optional dma property

2017-11-15 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:56:45PM +0200, Eugen Hristev wrote: > Added property for DMA configuration of the device. > > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > --- > Changes in v3: > None, but we discussed on the ML about whether we should have "dma-names" > present in the

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: add optional dma property

2017-11-15 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:56:45PM +0200, Eugen Hristev wrote: > Added property for DMA configuration of the device. > > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > --- > Changes in v3: > None, but we discussed on the ML about whether we should have "dma-names" > present in the binding even if it's only

[PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: add optional dma property

2017-11-15 Thread Eugen Hristev
Added property for DMA configuration of the device. Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev --- Changes in v3: None, but we discussed on the ML about whether we should have "dma-names" present in the binding even if it's only one. The helpers in the kernel to retrieve the

[PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: add optional dma property

2017-11-15 Thread Eugen Hristev
Added property for DMA configuration of the device. Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev --- Changes in v3: None, but we discussed on the ML about whether we should have "dma-names" present in the binding even if it's only one. The helpers in the kernel to retrieve the channel info rely on the presence