在 2016/5/17 15:33, Adrian Hunter 写道:
On 13/05/16 11:51, He Kuang wrote:
There's a problem in machine__findnew_vdso(), vdso buildid generated
by a 32-bit machine stores it with the name 'vdso', but when
processing buildid on a 64-bit machine with the same 'perf.data', perf
will search for vdso
On 16/05/16 16:32, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:51:49AM +, He Kuang escreveu:
>> There's a problem in machine__findnew_vdso(), vdso buildid generated
>> by a 32-bit machine stores it with the name 'vdso', but when
>> processing buildid on a 64-bit machine with th
On 13/05/16 11:51, He Kuang wrote:
> There's a problem in machine__findnew_vdso(), vdso buildid generated
> by a 32-bit machine stores it with the name 'vdso', but when
> processing buildid on a 64-bit machine with the same 'perf.data', perf
> will search for vdso named as 'vdso32' and get failed.
Em Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:51:49AM +, He Kuang escreveu:
> There's a problem in machine__findnew_vdso(), vdso buildid generated
> by a 32-bit machine stores it with the name 'vdso', but when
> processing buildid on a 64-bit machine with the same 'perf.data', perf
> will search for vdso named as
There's a problem in machine__findnew_vdso(), vdso buildid generated
by a 32-bit machine stores it with the name 'vdso', but when
processing buildid on a 64-bit machine with the same 'perf.data', perf
will search for vdso named as 'vdso32' and get failed.
This patch tries to find the exsiting dsos
5 matches
Mail list logo
