On 08/22/2012 03:22 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Sasha Levin (levinsasha...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On 08/22/2012 01:47 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:27:08AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
+static int __init nlm_init(void)
+{
+ hash_init(nlm_files);
+
* Sasha Levin (levinsasha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 01:47 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:27:08AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> +static int __init nlm_init(void)
> >> +{
> >> + hash_init(nlm_files);
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:13:54PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 01:47 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:27:08AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> +static int __init nlm_init(void)
> >> +{
> >> + hash_init(nlm_files);
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>
On 08/22/2012 01:47 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:27:08AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> +static int __init nlm_init(void)
>> +{
>> +hash_init(nlm_files);
>> +return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +module_init(nlm_init);
>
> That's giving me:
>
> fs/lockd/svcsubs.o: In function
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:27:08AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> +static int __init nlm_init(void)
> +{
> + hash_init(nlm_files);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +module_init(nlm_init);
That's giving me:
fs/lockd/svcsubs.o: In function `nlm_init':
/home/bfields/linux-2.6/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c:454:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:27:08AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
+static int __init nlm_init(void)
+{
+ hash_init(nlm_files);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+module_init(nlm_init);
That's giving me:
fs/lockd/svcsubs.o: In function `nlm_init':
/home/bfields/linux-2.6/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c:454: multiple
On 08/22/2012 01:47 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:27:08AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
+static int __init nlm_init(void)
+{
+hash_init(nlm_files);
+return 0;
+}
+
+module_init(nlm_init);
That's giving me:
fs/lockd/svcsubs.o: In function `nlm_init':
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:13:54PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 08/22/2012 01:47 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:27:08AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
+static int __init nlm_init(void)
+{
+ hash_init(nlm_files);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+module_init(nlm_init);
* Sasha Levin (levinsasha...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 08/22/2012 01:47 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:27:08AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
+static int __init nlm_init(void)
+{
+ hash_init(nlm_files);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+module_init(nlm_init);
That's giving me:
On 08/22/2012 03:22 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Sasha Levin (levinsasha...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 08/22/2012 01:47 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:27:08AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
+static int __init nlm_init(void)
+{
+ hash_init(nlm_files);
+ return 0;
+}
+
Switch lockd to use the new hashtable implementation. This reduces the amount of
generic unrelated code in lockd.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
fs/lockd/svcsubs.c | 66 ---
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git
Switch lockd to use the new hashtable implementation. This reduces the amount of
generic unrelated code in lockd.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com
---
fs/lockd/svcsubs.c | 66 ---
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 30
12 matches
Mail list logo