Re: [PATCH v3 16/19] media: rkvdec: Drop unneeded per_request driver-specific control flag

2020-08-18 Thread Jonas Karlman
On 2020-08-18 23:38, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 20:17 +, Jonas Karlman wrote: >> Hi Ezequiel, >> >> On 2020-08-14 15:36, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >>> Currently, the drivers makes no distinction between per_request >>> and mandatory, as both are used in the same request

Re: [PATCH v3 16/19] media: rkvdec: Drop unneeded per_request driver-specific control flag

2020-08-18 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 20:17 +, Jonas Karlman wrote: > Hi Ezequiel, > > On 2020-08-14 15:36, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > Currently, the drivers makes no distinction between per_request > > and mandatory, as both are used in the same request validate check. > > > > The driver only cares to know

Re: [PATCH v3 16/19] media: rkvdec: Drop unneeded per_request driver-specific control flag

2020-08-18 Thread Jonas Karlman
Hi Ezequiel, On 2020-08-14 15:36, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Currently, the drivers makes no distinction between per_request > and mandatory, as both are used in the same request validate check. > > The driver only cares to know if a given control is > required to be part of a request, so only one

[PATCH v3 16/19] media: rkvdec: Drop unneeded per_request driver-specific control flag

2020-08-14 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Currently, the drivers makes no distinction between per_request and mandatory, as both are used in the same request validate check. The driver only cares to know if a given control is required to be part of a request, so only one flag is needed. Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ---