Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: gadget: reword configuration choices

2017-03-28 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, Randy Dunlap writes: >> @@ -477,6 +477,12 @@ choice >>not be able work with that controller, or might need to implement >>a less common variant of a device class protocol. >> >> + The available choices each represent a single precomposed USB >>

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: gadget: reword configuration choices

2017-03-28 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, Randy Dunlap writes: >> @@ -477,6 +477,12 @@ choice >>not be able work with that controller, or might need to implement >>a less common variant of a device class protocol. >> >> + The available choices each represent a single precomposed USB >> + gadget

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: gadget: reword configuration choices

2017-03-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/10/17 05:11, Romain Izard wrote: > As USB_CONFIGFS is not a part of the "USB Gadget Drivers" choice > anymore, the name for the option and its attached description needs to > be more descriptive. It appears one level higher in the configuration > menu, and without the context provided by the

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: gadget: reword configuration choices

2017-03-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/10/17 05:11, Romain Izard wrote: > As USB_CONFIGFS is not a part of the "USB Gadget Drivers" choice > anymore, the name for the option and its attached description needs to > be more descriptive. It appears one level higher in the configuration > menu, and without the context provided by the

[PATCH v3 2/2] usb: gadget: reword configuration choices

2017-03-10 Thread Romain Izard
As USB_CONFIGFS is not a part of the "USB Gadget Drivers" choice anymore, the name for the option and its attached description needs to be more descriptive. It appears one level higher in the configuration menu, and without the context provided by the comments for the choice entry, it needs to

[PATCH v3 2/2] usb: gadget: reword configuration choices

2017-03-10 Thread Romain Izard
As USB_CONFIGFS is not a part of the "USB Gadget Drivers" choice anymore, the name for the option and its attached description needs to be more descriptive. It appears one level higher in the configuration menu, and without the context provided by the comments for the choice entry, it needs to