Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] secure_seq: use siphash24 instead of md5_transform

Hi Jason, [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on next-20161214] [cannot apply to v4.9] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] secure_seq: use siphash24 instead of md5_transform

Hi Jason, [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on next-20161214] [cannot apply to v4.9] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

[PATCH v3 2/3] secure_seq: use siphash24 instead of md5_transform

This gives a clear speed and security improvement. Siphash is both faster and is more solid crypto than the aging MD5. Rather than manually filling MD5 buffers, we simply create a layout by a simple anonymous struct, for which gcc generates rather efficient code. Signed-off-by: Jason A.

[PATCH v3 2/3] secure_seq: use siphash24 instead of md5_transform

This gives a clear speed and security improvement. Siphash is both faster and is more solid crypto than the aging MD5. Rather than manually filling MD5 buffers, we simply create a layout by a simple anonymous struct, for which gcc generates rather efficient code. Signed-off-by: Jason A.