Hi Hans,
On 15/01/2015 09:46, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13-01-15 15:22, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> The current implementation of the libahci allows using multiple PHYs
>> but not multiple regulators. This patch adds the support of multiple
>> regulators. Until now it was mandatory to have
Hi,
On 13-01-15 15:22, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
The current implementation of the libahci allows using multiple PHYs
but not multiple regulators. This patch adds the support of multiple
regulators. Until now it was mandatory to have a PHY under a subnode,
now a port subnode can contain either a
Hi Hans,
On 15/01/2015 09:46, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 13-01-15 15:22, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
The current implementation of the libahci allows using multiple PHYs
but not multiple regulators. This patch adds the support of multiple
regulators. Until now it was mandatory to have a PHY
Hi,
On 13-01-15 15:22, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
The current implementation of the libahci allows using multiple PHYs
but not multiple regulators. This patch adds the support of multiple
regulators. Until now it was mandatory to have a PHY under a subnode,
now a port subnode can contain either a
The current implementation of the libahci allows using multiple PHYs
but not multiple regulators. This patch adds the support of multiple
regulators. Until now it was mandatory to have a PHY under a subnode,
now a port subnode can contain either a regulator or a PHY (or both).
In order to be able
The current implementation of the libahci allows using multiple PHYs
but not multiple regulators. This patch adds the support of multiple
regulators. Until now it was mandatory to have a PHY under a subnode,
now a port subnode can contain either a regulator or a PHY (or both).
In order to be able
6 matches
Mail list logo
