On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:12:02 +
Chris Packham wrote:
> On 20/06/18 19:54, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:05:43 +1200
> > Chris Packham wrote:
> >
> >> Some Micron NAND chips (MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE:F) report 00 00 for the
> >> revision number field of the ONFI parameter pa
On 20/06/18 19:54, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:05:43 +1200
> Chris Packham wrote:
>
>> Some Micron NAND chips (MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE:F) report 00 00 for the
>> revision number field of the ONFI parameter page. Rather than rejecting
>> these outright assume ONFI version 1.0 if t
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:05:43 +1200
Chris Packham wrote:
> Some Micron NAND chips (MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE:F) report 00 00 for the
> revision number field of the ONFI parameter page. Rather than rejecting
> these outright assume ONFI version 1.0 if the revision number is 00 00.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bori
Some Micron NAND chips (MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE:F) report 00 00 for the
revision number field of the ONFI parameter page. Rather than rejecting
these outright assume ONFI version 1.0 if the revision number is 00 00.
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
---
This is now qualified
4 matches
Mail list logo