> > >> * moved sysfs device attributes to watchdog_dev.c, this required to
> > >> add exported watchdog_pretimeout_governor_name() interface
> > >
> > > Why this move? Before, all the pretimeout stuff was nicely encapsulated
> > > in its own file which could be compiled out. Now things are
> > >> * moved sysfs device attributes to watchdog_dev.c, this required to
> > >> add exported watchdog_pretimeout_governor_name() interface
> > >
> > > Why this move? Before, all the pretimeout stuff was nicely encapsulated
> > > in its own file which could be compiled out. Now things are
> >> * removed support of sleepable watchdog pretimeout governors
> >
> > This does.
>
> Same as above.
Just to make sure: I meant this does make reviewing easier since the
bottom half handling is the biggest thing to discuss and it is good to
seperate it out.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
> >> * removed support of sleepable watchdog pretimeout governors
> >
> > This does.
>
> Same as above.
Just to make sure: I meant this does make reviewing easier since the
bottom half handling is the biggest thing to discuss and it is good to
seperate it out.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:08:09PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On 08.06.2016 09:54, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> >> The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
> >> its purpose is to
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:08:09PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On 08.06.2016 09:54, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> >> The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
> >> its purpose is to
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:38:52AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> (Adding Michal Marek and linux-kbuild)
>
> On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 18:11 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > On 08.06.2016 16:53, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 06/08/2016 06:37 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > > > > > +comment
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:38:52AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> (Adding Michal Marek and linux-kbuild)
>
> On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 18:11 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > On 08.06.2016 16:53, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 06/08/2016 06:37 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > > > > > +comment
(Adding Michal Marek and linux-kbuild)
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 18:11 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 08.06.2016 16:53, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 06/08/2016 06:37 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > > > > +comment "Watchdog Pretimeout Governors"
> > > > > +
> > > > > +config
(Adding Michal Marek and linux-kbuild)
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 18:11 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 08.06.2016 16:53, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 06/08/2016 06:37 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > > > > +comment "Watchdog Pretimeout Governors"
> > > > > +
> > > > > +config
On 08.06.2016 16:53, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 06:37 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>
+comment "Watchdog Pretimeout Governors"
+
+config WATCHDOG_PRETIMEOUT_GOV
+ bool "Enable watchdog pretimeout governors"
+ default n
>>>
>>> I don't think 'default n" is
On 08.06.2016 16:53, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 06:37 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>
+comment "Watchdog Pretimeout Governors"
+
+config WATCHDOG_PRETIMEOUT_GOV
+ bool "Enable watchdog pretimeout governors"
+ default n
>>>
>>> I don't think 'default n" is
Hi Wolfram,
On 08.06.2016 09:54, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
>> its purpose is to allow users to select a desired handling of watchdog
>> pretimeout events,
Hi Wolfram,
On 08.06.2016 09:54, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
>> its purpose is to allow users to select a desired handling of watchdog
>> pretimeout events,
On 06/08/2016 06:37 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
+comment "Watchdog Pretimeout Governors"
+
+config WATCHDOG_PRETIMEOUT_GOV
+ bool "Enable watchdog pretimeout governors"
+ default n
I don't think 'default n" is needed.
No strict objections, but probably 'default n' may save
On 06/08/2016 06:37 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
+comment "Watchdog Pretimeout Governors"
+
+config WATCHDOG_PRETIMEOUT_GOV
+ bool "Enable watchdog pretimeout governors"
+ default n
I don't think 'default n" is needed.
No strict objections, but probably 'default n' may save
Hi Guenter,
On 08.06.2016 00:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
>> its purpose is to allow users to select a desired handling of watchdog
>> pretimeout events,
Hi Guenter,
On 08.06.2016 00:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
>> its purpose is to allow users to select a desired handling of watchdog
>> pretimeout events,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
> its purpose is to allow users to select a desired handling of watchdog
> pretimeout events, which may be generated by some watchdog devices.
>
> A user
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
> its purpose is to allow users to select a desired handling of watchdog
> pretimeout events, which may be generated by some watchdog devices.
>
> A user
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
> its purpose is to allow users to select a desired handling of watchdog
> pretimeout events, which may be generated by some watchdog devices.
>
> A user
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:38:45PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
> its purpose is to allow users to select a desired handling of watchdog
> pretimeout events, which may be generated by some watchdog devices.
>
> A user
The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
its purpose is to allow users to select a desired handling of watchdog
pretimeout events, which may be generated by some watchdog devices.
A user selects a default watchdog pretimeout governor during
compilation stage.
The change adds a simple watchdog pretimeout framework infrastructure,
its purpose is to allow users to select a desired handling of watchdog
pretimeout events, which may be generated by some watchdog devices.
A user selects a default watchdog pretimeout governor during
compilation stage.
24 matches
Mail list logo