On 8/26/20 7:01 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 26.08.20 14:18, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>> On 8/26/20 3:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 24.08.20 19:20, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 24.08.20 14:49, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 24.08.20 13:45, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>>
[...]
>> Also, there seems
On 26.08.20 14:18, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>
>
> On 8/26/20 3:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 24.08.20 19:20, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 24.08.20 14:49, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 24.08.20 13:45, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>
>
> On 8/22/20 11:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On
On 8/26/20 3:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 24.08.20 19:20, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 24.08.20 14:49, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 24.08.20 13:45, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
On 8/22/20 11:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 01.06.20 09:04, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>>
On 24.08.20 19:20, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 24.08.20 14:49, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 24.08.20 13:45, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/22/20 11:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 01.06.20 09:04, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> dma_request_chan_by_mask() can throw EPROBE_DEFER if DMA provider
; Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan
; linux-...@lists.infradead.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org;
simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com; dingu...@kernel.org; ma...@denx.de
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 5/8] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Handle probe
deferral while requesting DMA channel
On 24.08.20 14:49, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 24.08.20 13:45, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/22/20 11:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 01.06.20 09:04, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
dma_request_chan_by_mask() can throw EPROBE_DEFER if DMA provider
is not yet probed. Currently driver
On 24.08.20 13:45, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>
>
> On 8/22/20 11:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 01.06.20 09:04, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>>> dma_request_chan_by_mask() can throw EPROBE_DEFER if DMA provider
>>> is not yet probed. Currently driver just falls back to using PIO mode
>>> (which
On 8/22/20 11:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 01.06.20 09:04, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>> dma_request_chan_by_mask() can throw EPROBE_DEFER if DMA provider
>> is not yet probed. Currently driver just falls back to using PIO mode
>> (which is less efficient) in this case. Instead return probe
On 01.06.20 09:04, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> dma_request_chan_by_mask() can throw EPROBE_DEFER if DMA provider
> is not yet probed. Currently driver just falls back to using PIO mode
> (which is less efficient) in this case. Instead return probe deferral
> error as is so that driver will be re
dma_request_chan_by_mask() can throw EPROBE_DEFER if DMA provider
is not yet probed. Currently driver just falls back to using PIO mode
(which is less efficient) in this case. Instead return probe deferral
error as is so that driver will be re probed once DMA provider is
available.
Signed-off-by:
On Monday, June 1, 2020 8:47:22 AM EEST Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> dma_request_chan_by_mask() can throw EPROBE_DEFER if DMA provider
> is not yet probed. Currently driver just falls back to using PIO mode
> (which is less efficient) in this case. Instead return probe deferral
> error as is so
dma_request_chan_by_mask() can throw EPROBE_DEFER if DMA provider
is not yet probed. Currently driver just falls back to using PIO mode
(which is less efficient) in this case. Instead return probe deferral
error as is so that driver will be re probed once DMA provider is
available.
Signed-off-by:
12 matches
Mail list logo