Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Hi Marcin, On mar., nov. 29 2016, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > Gregory, > > 2016-11-29 11:19 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT > : >> Hi Marcin, >> >> On mar., nov. 29 2016, Marcin Wojtas wrote: >> >>> Hi Gregory, >>> >>> Another

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Hi Marcin, On mar., nov. 29 2016, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > Gregory, > > 2016-11-29 11:19 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT > : >> Hi Marcin, >> >> On mar., nov. 29 2016, Marcin Wojtas wrote: >> >>> Hi Gregory, >>> >>> Another remark below, sorry for noise. >>> >>> 2016-11-29 10:37 GMT+01:00 Gregory

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Gregory, 2016-11-29 11:19 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT : > Hi Marcin, > > On mar., nov. 29 2016, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > >> Hi Gregory, >> >> Another remark below, sorry for noise. >> >> 2016-11-29 10:37 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT >>

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Gregory, 2016-11-29 11:19 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT : > Hi Marcin, > > On mar., nov. 29 2016, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > >> Hi Gregory, >> >> Another remark below, sorry for noise. >> >> 2016-11-29 10:37 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT >> : >>> Until now the virtual address of the received buffer were

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Hi Marcin, On mar., nov. 29 2016, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > Hi Gregory, > > Another remark below, sorry for noise. > > 2016-11-29 10:37 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT > : >> Until now the virtual address of the received buffer were stored in the

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Hi Marcin, On mar., nov. 29 2016, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > Hi Gregory, > > Another remark below, sorry for noise. > > 2016-11-29 10:37 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT > : >> Until now the virtual address of the received buffer were stored in the >> cookie field of the rx descriptor. However, this

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Hi Marcin, On mar., nov. 29 2016, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > Hi Gregory, > > Apparently HWBM had a mistake in implementation, please see below. > > 2016-11-29 10:37 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT > : >> Until now the virtual address of the

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Hi Marcin, On mar., nov. 29 2016, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > Hi Gregory, > > Apparently HWBM had a mistake in implementation, please see below. > > 2016-11-29 10:37 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT > : >> Until now the virtual address of the received buffer were stored in the >> cookie field of the rx

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Hi Gregory, Another remark below, sorry for noise. 2016-11-29 10:37 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT : > Until now the virtual address of the received buffer were stored in the > cookie field of the rx descriptor. However, this field is 32-bits only > which prevents

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Hi Gregory, Another remark below, sorry for noise. 2016-11-29 10:37 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT : > Until now the virtual address of the received buffer were stored in the > cookie field of the rx descriptor. However, this field is 32-bits only > which prevents to use the driver on a 64-bits

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Hi Gregory, Apparently HWBM had a mistake in implementation, please see below. 2016-11-29 10:37 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT : > Until now the virtual address of the received buffer were stored in the > cookie field of the rx descriptor. However, this field is

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Hi Gregory, Apparently HWBM had a mistake in implementation, please see below. 2016-11-29 10:37 GMT+01:00 Gregory CLEMENT : > Until now the virtual address of the received buffer were stored in the > cookie field of the rx descriptor. However, this field is 32-bits only > which prevents to use

[PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Until now the virtual address of the received buffer were stored in the cookie field of the rx descriptor. However, this field is 32-bits only which prevents to use the driver on a 64-bits architecture. With this patch the virtual address is stored in an array not shared with the hardware (no

[PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] net: mvneta: Use cacheable memory to store the rx buffer virtual address

Until now the virtual address of the received buffer were stored in the cookie field of the rx descriptor. However, this field is 32-bits only which prevents to use the driver on a 64-bits architecture. With this patch the virtual address is stored in an array not shared with the hardware (no