es, but all are in hugetlbfs specific code,
> > > > so I think we can apply this independent of thp patches.
> > > > -
> > > > From: Naoya Horiguchi
> > > > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:12:30 -0400
> > > > Subject: [PATCH v4] hugetlbfs: suppor
t; -
> > > From: Naoya Horiguchi
> > > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:12:30 -0400
> > > Subject: [PATCH v4] hugetlbfs: support split page table lock
> > >
> > > Currently all of page table handling by hugetlbfs code are done under
> > > mm-&
; Kirill's patches (although without CONFIG_SPLIT_*_PTLOCK_CPUS.)
> >
> > This patch changes many lines, but all are in hugetlbfs specific code,
> > so I think we can apply this independent of thp patches.
> > -
> > From: Naoya Horiguchi
> > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 20
irill's patches (although without CONFIG_SPLIT_*_PTLOCK_CPUS.)
> >
> > This patch changes many lines, but all are in hugetlbfs specific code,
> > so I think we can apply this independent of thp patches.
> > -
> > From: Naoya Horiguchi
> > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013
, but all are in hugetlbfs specific code,
> so I think we can apply this independent of thp patches.
> -
> From: Naoya Horiguchi
> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:12:30 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH v4] hugetlbfs: support split page table lock
>
> Currently all of page table
, but all are in hugetlbfs specific code,
> so I think we can apply this independent of thp patches.
> -
> From: Naoya Horiguchi
> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:12:30 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH v4] hugetlbfs: support split page table lock
>
> Currently all of page table
apply this independent of thp patches.
-
From: Naoya Horiguchi
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:12:30 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v4] hugetlbfs: support split page table lock
Currently all of page table handling by hugetlbfs code are done under
mm->page_table_lock. So when a process have many threads
7 matches
Mail list logo