On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 01:13:05PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Before this commit the extcon-arizona code was mixing pm_runtime_get()
> and pm_runtime_get_sync() in different places.
>
> In all places where pm_runtime_get[_sync]() is called, the code
> makes use of the device immediately after
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 01:13:05PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Before this commit the extcon-arizona code was mixing pm_runtime_get()
> and pm_runtime_get_sync() in different places.
>
> In all places where pm_runtime_get[_sync]() is called, the code
> makes use of the device immediately after
Before this commit the extcon-arizona code was mixing pm_runtime_get()
and pm_runtime_get_sync() in different places.
In all places where pm_runtime_get[_sync]() is called, the code
makes use of the device immediately after the call.
This means that we should always use pm_runtime_get_sync().
3 matches
Mail list logo