Re: [PATCH v4 05/13] extcon: arizona: Always use pm_runtime_get_sync() when we need the device to be awake

2021-01-30 Thread Charles Keepax
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 01:13:05PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Before this commit the extcon-arizona code was mixing pm_runtime_get() > and pm_runtime_get_sync() in different places. > > In all places where pm_runtime_get[_sync]() is called, the code > makes use of the device immediately after

Re: [PATCH v4 05/13] extcon: arizona: Always use pm_runtime_get_sync() when we need the device to be awake

2021-01-23 Thread Charles Keepax
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 01:13:05PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Before this commit the extcon-arizona code was mixing pm_runtime_get() > and pm_runtime_get_sync() in different places. > > In all places where pm_runtime_get[_sync]() is called, the code > makes use of the device immediately after

[PATCH v4 05/13] extcon: arizona: Always use pm_runtime_get_sync() when we need the device to be awake

2021-01-23 Thread Hans de Goede
Before this commit the extcon-arizona code was mixing pm_runtime_get() and pm_runtime_get_sync() in different places. In all places where pm_runtime_get[_sync]() is called, the code makes use of the device immediately after the call. This means that we should always use pm_runtime_get_sync().