On 12/20/13 08:55, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 23:08 -0500, David Long wrote:
From: "David A. Long"
Change the generic ARM probes code to pass in the opcode and
architecture-specific
structure separately instead of using struct kprobe, so we do not pollute
code being
On 12/20/13 08:55, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 23:08 -0500, David Long wrote:
From: David A. Long dave.l...@linaro.org
Change the generic ARM probes code to pass in the opcode and
architecture-specific
structure separately instead of using struct kprobe, so we do not
On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 23:08 -0500, David Long wrote:
> From: "David A. Long"
>
> Change the generic ARM probes code to pass in the opcode and
> architecture-specific
> structure separately instead of using struct kprobe, so we do not pollute
> code being used only for uprobes or other
On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 23:08 -0500, David Long wrote:
From: David A. Long dave.l...@linaro.org
Change the generic ARM probes code to pass in the opcode and
architecture-specific
structure separately instead of using struct kprobe, so we do not pollute
code being used only for uprobes or
From: "David A. Long"
Change the generic ARM probes code to pass in the opcode and
architecture-specific
structure separately instead of using struct kprobe, so we do not pollute
code being used only for uprobes or other non-kprobes instruction
interpretation.
Signed-off-by: David A. Long
---
From: David A. Long dave.l...@linaro.org
Change the generic ARM probes code to pass in the opcode and
architecture-specific
structure separately instead of using struct kprobe, so we do not pollute
code being used only for uprobes or other non-kprobes instruction
interpretation.
Signed-off-by:
6 matches
Mail list logo