On Tue, Feb 17 2015, Yury Norov wrote:
> The new implementation takes less space in the sources
> (see diffstat) and in the object. For me it's 710 vs 453
> bytes of text. It also shows a better performance.
>
> find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo.
>
> In this patch 2 macros were
On Tue, Feb 17 2015, Yury Norov yury.no...@gmail.com wrote:
The new implementation takes less space in the sources
(see diffstat) and in the object. For me it's 710 vs 453
bytes of text. It also shows a better performance.
find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo.
In this patch
The new implementation takes less space in the sources
(see diffstat) and in the object. For me it's 710 vs 453
bytes of text. It also shows a better performance.
find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo.
In this patch 2 macros were introduced: {LOW,HIGH}_BITS_MASK,
that are doing
The new implementation takes less space in the sources
(see diffstat) and in the object. For me it's 710 vs 453
bytes of text. It also shows a better performance.
find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo.
In this patch 2 macros were introduced: {LOW,HIGH}_BITS_MASK,
that are doing
4 matches
Mail list logo