Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] lib: find_*_bit reimplementation

2015-02-18 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On Tue, Feb 17 2015, Yury Norov wrote: > The new implementation takes less space in the sources > (see diffstat) and in the object. For me it's 710 vs 453 > bytes of text. It also shows a better performance. > > find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. > > In this patch 2 macros were

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] lib: find_*_bit reimplementation

2015-02-18 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On Tue, Feb 17 2015, Yury Norov yury.no...@gmail.com wrote: The new implementation takes less space in the sources (see diffstat) and in the object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows a better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. In this patch

[PATCH v4 1/3] lib: find_*_bit reimplementation

2015-02-16 Thread Yury Norov
The new implementation takes less space in the sources (see diffstat) and in the object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows a better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. In this patch 2 macros were introduced: {LOW,HIGH}_BITS_MASK, that are doing

[PATCH v4 1/3] lib: find_*_bit reimplementation

2015-02-16 Thread Yury Norov
The new implementation takes less space in the sources (see diffstat) and in the object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows a better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. In this patch 2 macros were introduced: {LOW,HIGH}_BITS_MASK, that are doing